The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has mandated the removal of the term “ORS” from non-medicinal beverages, calling its usage on sugary drinks misleading and potentially dangerous especially for children.
Glimpse:
In a landmark directive on October 14, 2025, the FSSAI ruled that any fruit-based, ready-to-drink, or non-carbonated beverage using “ORS” in its name or branding, even with prefixes or suffixes, is misbranded under public health law. The term must be removed immediately from labels, advertisements, and trademarks unless the product meets WHO-approved ORS formulation standards.
Indian food regulator FSSAI has issued a sweeping new directive instructing all food and beverage companies to eliminate the use of the term “ORS” (Oral Rehydration Solution) from product names, trademarks, and packaging. The order issued on October 14, 2025 rescinds previous permissions granted in 2022 and 2024, which had allowed some companies to use “ORS” in drinks so long as they included a disclaimer stating the product was not a WHO-recommended formulation.
FSSAI made it clear that using “ORS” in beverages that do not meet the medical ORS standards is false, deceptive, ambiguous, and erroneous, violating labelling norms under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The regulator has directed all food-business operators to comply immediately and warned that failure to abide will be treated as misbranding, punishable under Sections 52 and 53 of the Act.
This move comes after persistent activism by Dr. Sivaranjani Santosh, a paediatrician from Hyderabad, who for eight years has campaigned against high-sugar, “electrolyte” drinks being mistakenly marketed as ORS a practice she warned poses serious health risks, particularly in dehydration cases. The FSSAI’s directive has been hailed by child-health experts as a major public-health win, clarifying that only medically approved WHO-style ORS formulations should use the term legitimately.
Legally, the policy has now also been backed by the Delhi High Court, which upheld the FSSAI’s ban, rejecting a challenge by a company that manufactured ORS-branded electrolyte drinks. The court emphasised the “serious public health considerations” behind the regulator’s action. However, some earlier production has been permitted to run down, as the court clarified its order does not apply to new manufacturing leaving questions over how quickly misleading products will actually be phased out.
“Using ‘ORS’ on sugary drinks misleads caregivers. Only WHO-approved ORS formulations should bear that name anything else can worsen dehydration instead of treating it.”
By
HB Team
